The People's Democratic Republic of Insomnia

"It's just laser beams and power chords--there's no plot at all."

Tuesday, October 30, 2007

Games and Sports

I don't know why this bugs me, but it does. It just irritates me when people call baseball a sport. Not just baseball, but lots of other competitive activities like NASCAR, shooting, throwing darts...Not sports, people. Not. These are games. Football, rugby, basketball--these are sports.

Let's start with definitions. Yes, I know the dictionary definitions of sport and game. I've looked 'em up in my very own OED*. But it's been posited that a proper language should have one word for everything and two words for nothing, so I think it's time to tease out some finer shades of meaning.

A GAME is a competitive event which is at least theoretically good-natured (thus a game of poker qualifies, even if high-stakes) in which the outcome is based on skill or luck of any sort. It is not necessarily physically demanding.

A SPORT is a competitive event which is at least theoretically good-natured** in which the outcome is dependent on some sort of physical capability. Sport IS necessarily physically demanding.

A useful litmus test to determine between sport and game is: Can you do it without sweating?

EXAMPLES:
Sports
Football, rugby, basketball, lacrosse, hockey, foot racing

Games
Baseball, darts, bowling, bocce, auto racing

Yes, I recognize that standing on a baseball field on a hot August day waiting for someone to hit a ball in your direction is enough to make you sweat. But that's a function of the environment, not the game, so it doesn't count.

On a similar note, it's been argued that NASCAR should be a sport, since the drivers sweat so much due to the heat generated by the cars. Not so. This is equivalent to saying that chess, played in a hot room, is a sport.

Horse racing is a sport. The athletes all have four legs and hooves.

I hope this clears things up.


*thanks Ed
**thus war does not qualify, despite being known as The Sport of Kings

10 Comments:

  • At 30/10/07 21:07 , Blogger KAISER ANDY I said...

    Well, then why do they call it a Football game, but a soccer match?

    What about sport-fishing? Sport-shooting?

    I understand that you beleive that the line is between very physically demanding, and not-so-physically demanding, but I'm not buyin' what yer sellin'.

    and remember-
    NonAthleticSportCenteredAroundRednecks.

    and lastly, you have proven that Darts is a quite physically demanding sport (or at least recovery is), so you might want to take it off the list.

     
  • At 30/10/07 23:20 , Blogger Ted said...

    "They" are idiots. What "They" call the contest is immaterial.

    I'm glad you brought up the sport-fishing/shooting issue. I'll give you that collecting of game trophies (to use another definition of game) can be competitive, in the sense of "I can bag more fish/deer/squirrels/man-eating radishes than you". However, if you're sitting in a tree stand (or moseying through the woods, or putting along in your bass boat) waiting for a shot/strike/etc, that's a game, not a sport.

    And finally, just because you can get injured doing it doesn't make it a sport. I know people with Dungeons & Dragons related injuries, too.

    Sorry about your toe, Andy.

     
  • At 31/10/07 14:21 , Blogger KAISER ANDY I said...

    Do the DyD guys get carpal tunnel from rolling the dice too much?

     
  • At 31/10/07 15:16 , Blogger Yankee John said...

    I find it fascinating that the “dividing line” seems, more often then not, based on a timed event. Apparently, things which have a fixed conclusion (60 minutes plus sudden death OT in a regular Pro Football game) are sports whereas activities which can be concluded or extended in other ways (9+ innings or rain called early in a Pro Baseball game) are games. I think this goes back to an idea that sports are of a fixed and higher order, while games can end when your Mommy calls you in for dinner.

    This is a stupid argument, Ted. By this definition, the creation of the universe is a sport because God did it in six days. But the creation of a city is a game because Rome wasn’t built in a day. Fame is a sport because everyone gets fifteen minutes. Love is a game because it timeless. Bull riding is a sport because you have to stay on for eight seconds. Running with the bulls in Pamplona is a game because no one can call competitive goring a sport.

    Take Pro Beach Volleyball. Competitive. Team event. Physically exerting. Painful (sand) and exhilarating (Women’s Pro Beach Volleyball). Not timed. Game, huh?

    Downhill Skiing. Competitive. Individual event. Physically exerting. Painful (agony of defeat) and exhilarating (perhaps if you’re Nordic). Timed. Sport, right?

    How about a new criterion: level of athleticism required. I argue that any activity requiring a high level of athleticism (not skill but physical talent) is a sport. I argue that any activity that can be played from an easy chair or while drinking a cold beer is a game. There can be crossover - So when the Yankees beat the Red Sux it is the sport of baseball. When the Rec league hardball tournament is called on account of empty cooler, it’s a baesball game. Some things are activities of skill: chess, poker, bowling, darts, and target shooting. Some things are activities of physical talent: baseball, football, soccer, and skateboarding. And like it or not, the most difficult thing to do in all of professional sports is hit a major league curveball.

    I would also stipulate that certain games from childhood mature into sports and others do not. The Super Bowl is a sporting event. Adult kickball league is a game. There will always be questions about “games” which require some amount of physical prowess, but by and large I think we can agree that Greco-Roman wrestling is a sport. Professional Wrestling is a game.

     
  • At 1/11/07 13:42 , Blogger KAISER ANDY I said...

    Ted, I do believe that John is correct here. Now, before you say,"Hold it, hold it, hold it- what in the wild world of sports is agoin' on here," I do realize that the opener to your blog was the caveat "I don't know why it bugs me," but you did post this right after John's mention of the sport of baseball on his blog, so you kinda had it coming.

    In other sports news: India 98, Pakastan 76 1/2. It is currently 30 minutes past two, GMT.

     
  • At 2/11/07 14:06 , Blogger Ted said...

    YJ--
    I don't buy the "timed event" thing. Several different sports (mostly in the martial arts and raquet sport categories) go on until someone scores a set number of points. Volleyball is one example of such sports.

    Universe creation, fame, love and running away from angry hoofstock are neither games nor sports because they are not competitive. Ditto professional wrestling. That's (bad) acting, just like all other staged fight scenes.

    Level of athleticism isn't something that enters into it. Just as NFL pros can play touch with their kids* without recategorizing football, no amount of athletic conditioning is ever going to make competitive tiddlywinks into a sport.

    You assert that "certain games from childhood mature into sports and others do not". While I take exception to the term "mature"** I agree with the rest of the statement completely. This categorization serves to determine which is which.


    *maybe I should rephrase that
    **"mature" implies that there is some superiority of sport over game. Such is not the case.

     
  • At 2/11/07 14:10 , Blogger Ted said...

    KAI--
    John was alert enough to notice my earlier post asking someone to remind me to rant about the definition of "sport", clever enough to figure out what I was talking about, and a good enough friend to give me the opening with his post. Thanks for giving me the opportunity to thank him.

    Enough of the Mutual Admiration Society. I came here for an argument.

     
  • At 6/11/07 19:48 , Blogger Yankee John said...

    Dear Doctor Vacuous,

    First, I’m buying you a calendar after I verify the words "sarcasm" and "irony" are not listed therein (I wouldn’t want to tax you unnecessarily.)

    Secondly, I was trying to classify your rant into some type of logical philosophy and the closest I could get (besides the “I like what I like and if you don’t agree, I’m taking my ball and going home” dogma) was the “timed event theory.” You’re right. It is a stupid argument. I said as much. After all, it was your argument. Unless you’d like to double down for “because I said so.”

    Thirdly, if not “athletic prowess”, by what new standard should society differentiate between sport and game? Given that at best it is a semantic argument, why not leave it up to the people. That’s right everyone, exercise your democratic right to make a complete and arbitrary ass out of yourself. Come one come all, cast your vote for sport or game – oh, wait. That won’t work. Everyone is either watching sports or playing games. Stupid commoners, not knowing which is which. Thank goodness for ol’ doc latexfinger.

    Don’t bring half a hemisphere to a brainfight. You may be smarter but I’m tons more smartass.

     
  • At 7/11/07 20:30 , Blogger Ted said...

    Tons more something, anyway.

     
  • At 7/11/07 21:09 , Blogger Yankee John said...

    that's it? aftet two lucid and well presented postings?

    I get more fight from Mello's blossom.

     

Post a Comment

Subscribe to Post Comments [Atom]

<< Home